Dec 7, 2013 | Seasonality, trading strategies
Seasonality is always on a traders radar in December. The Santa Claus rally and all.
In this seasonal vein, I ran a scan of a decent database of liquid stocks with the following idea in mind.
1) The percentage return for the last 20 trading days of the year.
2) Look back the last 8 years
3) Only show me stocks that have either all positive or all negative returns in those 8 years
As the Santa Claus rally is a seasonal feature of the markets it made sense to me to find stocks that do the same thing. Might as well get as many odds in my favor as I can.
So here’s what I found.
17 stocks have had positive returns in the last 20 trading days of the year, 8 years in a row.
The top performer was AAR Corp – symbol AIR. It’s average return over the last 8 years was a whopping 13.98%. Pretty impressive for 20 days. More impressive was the consistency. The range of returns was between 7% and 23%, so no 98% wild card distorting the pattern.
Of course there’s never any guarantee this will continue, but it’s impressive to see.
AIQ TradingExpert Pro’s Expert Design Studio was used to create the scan. FREE trial at
http://aiqsystems.com/PLSbrochure2.htm
Dec 3, 2013 | gold, trading strategies
A long time ago I evolved into something of a “go with the flow” kind of guy – at least when it comes to the financial markets. Sure, in my youth I spent a fair amount of time staring into my crystal ball and trying to “pick tops and bottoms with uncanny accuracy.” Unfortunately, it took me a long time to figure out that my crystal ball was not actually functioning.
So I have long understood the benefit of simply using some objective method to define the trend is either “up” or “down”, and just kind of seeing where it leads. This approach came in pretty handy in 2013 when the “news” was essentially uniformly bad from start to finish. But did the stock market care – oh contraire!
Updating the old adage “Don’t Fight the Fed” into today’s jargon:
“If the Fed is pumpin’, the stock market’s jumpin’. ”
And at the moment, there appears to be no end in sight (at least regarding QE2IB, or “Quantitative Easing to Infinity and Beyond”). So why do I all of a sudden have a foolish hankering to buy gold stocks? This makes no sense at all. In Figure 1 you see four different gold stock related investment vehicles. Can you say “well established downtrend?” Sure, I knew you could. Some have broken down to new lows others are still holding out hope of establishing a double bottom. And for some inexplicable reason, I feel this urge to play the long side.
Figure 1 – Gold Stock Double Bottom; In the Making or Wishful Thinking? (Courtesy AIQ TradingExpert)
The key hesitation here is the simple fact that on the approximately last 57 times it “looked” like a potential bottom in gold stocks…….it wasn’t. Will this time around be any different? Probably not. Still……….in the immortal words of Glenn Frey, “the lure of easy money, it’s got a very strong appeal.”
To Give In Or To Fight the Urge?
Investing and trading is a game best played by establishing certain rules (for example, “go with the trend”, “cut your losses”, etc.) and then sticking to them. But human nature is, well let’s be blunt here, a pain in the butt. The urge to “pick a bottom” is one of the stronger, more compelling urges that any trader feels. What a coup if you pull it off (which of course you probably won’t)!
So here is the question? If you feel the urge to “pick a bottom”, should you:
a) Fight the urge in every case?
b) Give into the urge and bet the ranch?
c) Give into the urge and risk a small, acceptable amount of capital?
If you picked answer, b) my frank advice is to let someone else handle your money.
If you picked answer a), more power to you and I greatly respect your discipline.
If you picked answer c) yo, what up dog!? (Sorry, I inadvertently walked in on some video my kids were watching)
I personally can live with answer c). For a couple of reasons. First of let’s establish the fact that choosing answer c will probably lead to your losing money more often than not. Sorry, that’s just the reality. However, it can also serve as something of a “release valve”, whereby the occasional small mistake reminds us not to make a big huge mistake (i.e., answer b, somewhere down the line)
So let take a look at one possibility.
Finding a Trade (for better or worse)
I used www.OptionsAnalysis.com to look for long call trades on tickers GDX, GDXJ, XAU, NEM and GG. Sorting for Bullish percent to double and then among the top trades chose the one with the highest Gamma (long story short, high gamma in my book equals more “bang for the buck”)
The trade I came up with was buying the GDX January14 22 call at $1.06 as shown in Figures 2 and 3.
So is this a good idea? In all candor, probably not. But let me just explain what I am looking at.
Let’s say I am a trader with a $25,000 trading account and are willing to risk (throw away?) 2% of our trading capital on a foolhardy attempt to pick a bottom (hey, it’s my account, I can do what I want).
This means I can risk $500 ($25K x .02). So if the option trades at $1.06, this means I can buy up to 4 contracts and risk $424.
So what are the likely (or at least possible) outcomes?
#1) Murphy’s Law being what it is, if I take this trade gold stocks will almost certainly continue to sink. In this case the worst case scenario is that I hold the calls until January expiration and lose $424.
#2) if somehow, the market gods smile, let’s assume that GDX bounces back up to its early November high near $24.70. In this case, the trade will generate a profit of $660 to $880 or more, depending on how soon GDX bounces.
Summary
As a rule I would never advocate for someone else to “pick a bottom”. But let’s face, every once in awhile, the urge strikes. So if you decide to give into the urge, make sure:
a) You don’t risk very much money.
b) You have enough upside potential to at least make it worth your while to do something that you may well look back upon and say, “Why the heck did I do that?”
As long as you employ a) and b) above, I view it as sort of a win-win situation (depending of course on how you define “win”).
If the underlying security in question does bounce to higher ground, you have the opportunity to generate a nice profit.
On the other hand, if the underlying security continues its current trend, you are served a powerful reminder of why you don’t try very often to “pick tops and bottoms with uncanny accuracy.”
So the bottom line is this: I am NOT telling you that I think gold stocks are about to bounce and that you should buy gold stocks (or options on gold stocks). What I am telling you is that sometimes the urge to speculate will rise to the surface.
When that urge strikes there is a right way and a wrong way to react.
Jay Kaeppel
Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro (http://aiq.com) client
Jay has published four books on futures, option and stock trading. He was Head Trader for a CTA from 1995 through 2003. As a computer programmer, he co-developed trading software that was voted “Best Option Trading System” six consecutive years by readers of Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities magazine. A featured speaker and instructor at live and on-line trading seminars, he has authored over 30 articles in Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities magazine, Active Trader magazine, Futures & Options magazine and on-line at www.Investopedia.com.
Nov 14, 2013 | Seasonality, trading strategies
OK I’ll admit I am a little early with this one. But maybe not as early as you might think. In fact, as I was out driving I saw the first house in my neighborhood to have Christmas lights up…and lit. Hey, desperate times I guess.
While the stock market continues to push to new highs, “morale” is not quite what one might expect. This may be due in part to the fact that it is near impossible to peruse the financial media these days and not come away with a sense of foreboding, given all of the warnings and admonitions and liberal use of word like “frothy” and “bubble.” And make no mistake, I have voiced a few concerns recently myself and have gone so far as to suggest that investors consider hedging with VXX call options (http://jayonthemarkets.com/2013/10/30/is-vxx-issuing-a-warning/) from time to time.
Still, as a person who has been involved in the financial markets for a while I understand the power of the trend. So despite all of my personal concerns about the economy, debt, etc., etc., 2013 has been good to “go with the flow” kind of people. In the short-term, the stock market does appear to be a bit “overbought” and perhaps “due for a correction.” But while anything can happen, history suggests that people who are looking for a stock market collapse before the end of the year may be disappointed. Cue the Christmas music.
The Santa Claus Rally
As I define it, the Santa Claus rally time period:
-Begins at the close of trading on the Friday before Thanksgiving.
-Extends through the close of the third trading day of January.
And that’s all there is to it.
So how has the stock market performed during this period in the past? I am so glad you asked.
Figure 1 displays the growth of $1,000 invested in the Dow Jones Industrials Average only during the pre-Thanksgiving through post-New Year’s period I just described, starting in November 1949.

Figure 1 – Growth of $1,000 invested in Dow Jones Industrials during Santa Claus Rally period (1949-2012)
Figure 2 displays some important figures regarding this performance.
Figure 2 – Stock Market Performance during Santa Claus Rally Time Period
One other thing to note is that this Santa Claus Rally time period has witnessed an advance by the Dow during 26 of the last 28 and 32 of the last 35 years. It’s tough to the beat that kind of consistency.
Summary
So does all of this mean that “you can’t lose” trading stocks during this “sure thing” time period guaranteed to generate “above average, risk free” returns? Ah, if only. All any of this really means is that stocks have performed well during this time period in the past. What will happen this year remains to be seen.
Still, the real point is that investors may be wise to give the bullish case every benefit of the doubt starting in late November.
Jay Kaeppel
Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro (http://aiq.com) client
Jay has published four books on futures, option and stock trading. He was Head Trader for a CTA from 1995 through 2003. As a computer programmer, he co-developed trading software that was voted “Best Option Trading System” six consecutive years by readers of Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities magazine. A featured speaker and instructor at live and on-line trading seminars, he has authored over 30 articles in Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities magazine, Active Trader magazine, Futures & Options magazine and on-line at www.Investopedia.com.
P.S. For all of you “numbers geeks” out there, the annual performance during the Santa Claus Rally Time period appears below
Period Ending |
DJIA % +(-) |
1/5/50
|
3.6
|
1/4/51
|
4.0
|
1/4/52
|
3.9
|
1/6/53
|
4.6
|
1/6/54
|
2.9
|
1/5/55
|
5.1
|
1/5/56
|
0.2
|
1/4/57
|
3.7
|
1/6/58
|
(0.0)
|
1/6/59
|
5.7
|
1/6/60
|
5.8
|
1/5/61
|
3.2
|
1/4/62
|
(1.0)
|
1/4/63
|
5.0
|
1/6/64
|
5.0
|
1/6/65
|
(1.2)
|
1/5/66
|
3.0
|
1/5/67
|
(0.5)
|
1/4/68
|
4.3
|
1/6/69
|
(3.1)
|
1/6/70
|
(2.4)
|
1/6/71
|
10.0
|
1/5/72
|
11.6
|
1/4/73
|
3.4
|
1/4/74
|
2.0
|
1/6/75
|
3.6
|
1/6/76
|
6.0
|
1/5/77
|
3.1
|
1/5/78
|
(3.7)
|
1/4/79
|
3.6
|
1/4/80
|
1.6
|
1/6/81
|
1.5
|
1/6/82
|
0.9
|
1/5/83
|
2.3
|
1/5/84
|
2.5
|
1/4/85
|
(0.3)
|
1/6/86
|
5.7
|
1/6/87
|
4.3
|
1/6/88
|
6.5
|
1/5/89
|
6.2
|
1/4/90
|
5.4
|
1/4/91
|
0.6
|
1/6/92
|
13.9
|
1/6/93
|
2.4
|
1/5/94
|
2.8
|
1/5/95
|
0.9
|
1/4/96
|
3.7
|
1/6/97
|
1.5
|
1/6/98
|
1.8
|
1/6/99
|
4.2
|
1/5/00
|
1.1
|
1/4/01
|
2.7
|
1/4/02
|
4.0
|
1/6/03
|
(0.4)
|
1/6/04
|
9.5
|
1/5/05
|
1.3
|
1/5/06
|
1.1
|
1/5/07
|
0.4
|
1/4/08
|
(2.9)
|
1/6/09
|
12.0
|
1/6/10
|
2.5
|
1/5/11
|
4.6
|
1/5/12
|
5.3
|
1/4/13
|
6.7
|
Nov 11, 2013 | indicators, MACD, trading strategies
In “Reversing MACD: The Sequel” in the November 2013 issue of Stocks and Commodities, author Johnny Dough presents functions that return price values for the MACD indicators. I am providing AIQ code for the following functions based on the AmiBroker code given in Dough’s article:
-
PMACDsignal returns price where the MACD crosses its signal line or where there is an MACD histogram cross of the zero line
-
PMACDlevel returns price where the MACD is equal to the level value
-
PMACDeq returns price where the MACD is equal to the previous bar MACD.
I created some additional rules to show reports that display the price values of the functions:
- The ShowValues rule will display all function values for stocks that are over the minPrice level input
- The NearXO rule will list only those stocks that are less than or equal to the average range percentage of crossing over of the MACD oscillator
- The PMACxup rule lists cross-ups today on the MACD oscillator using the PMACDsignal price
- The PMACxdn “if” rule lists cross-downs today on the MACD oscillator using the PMACDsignal price.
The NearXO report is useful if you want to enter a position on a buy or sell stop-on-close when the MACD oscillator crosses zero. This report sorts by the MACD oscillator. The ones with a positive MACD oscillator amounts calculate the price that would be used to go short at the close for a cross-down on the oscillator. The ones with negative MACD oscillator amounts calculate the price that would be used to go long at the close for a cross-up on the oscillator.
I ran the NearXO report on September 10, 2013 using the NASDAQ 100 list of stocks. There were 12 that showed up on the report, meaning they were near a cross-up or cross-down of the MACD oscillator.
In Figure 5, I show a chart of Qiagen NV (QGEN), which appeared on the report. The report showed that a next day’s close price of 20.72 or higher would cause the MACD oscillator to go from negative to positive. On September 11, 2013, QGEN closed at 20.98 and the MACD oscillator moves to a positive number.

FIGURE 5: AIQ. Here’s a sample chart of QGEN with the MACD oscillator, looking for closing price (white line) and price to make a cross up or cross down on the oscillator (dark green line).
The AIQ code and EDS file can be downloaded from www.TradersEdgeSystems.com/traderstips.htm.
!REVERSING MACD: THE SEQUEL
!Author: Johnny Dough, TASC November 2013
!Coded by: Richard Denning 9/9/2013
!www.TradersEdgeSystems.com
!INPUTS:
price is [close].
period_X is 12.
period_Y is 25.
period_Z is 9.
level is 0.
minPrice is 10.
rangeFactor is 1.
!PMACDsignal returns price where MACD crosses signal line
! or MACD histogram cross of 0:
alphaX is 2 / ( 1 + period_X ).
alphaY is 2 / ( 1 + period_Y ).
alphaZ is 2 / ( 1 + period_Z ).
One_alphaX is 1 – alphaX.
One_alphaY is 1 – alphaY.
One_alphaZ is 1 – alphaZ.
MACDvalue is expavg( price, period_X ) – expavg( price, period_Y ).
MACDvalue_1 is valresult(MACDvalue,1).
MACDsignal is expavg( MACDvalue, period_Z ).
PMACDsignal is ( MACDsignal – expavg( price, period_X ) * one_alphaX
+ expavg( price, period_Y ) * one_alphaY ) / ( alphaX – alphaY ).
!PMACDlevel returns price where MACD is equal to level value
! e.g. PMACDlevel(0, C, 12, 16) would return the series
! where next price would make MACD=0
PMACDlevel is (Level + expavg( price, period_Y ) * one_alphaY
– expavg( price, period_X )* one_alphaX ) / ( alphaX – alphaY ).
!PMACDeq returns price where MACD is equal to previous bar MACD
PMACDeq is ( expavg( price, period_X ) * alphaX
– expavg( price, period_Y )* alphaY ) / ( alphaX – alphaY ).
!ADDITIONAL CODE NOT PROVIDED BY AUTHOR:
PMACDsignal_1 is valresult(PMACDsignal,1). !PLOT-OFFSET BY ONE DAY
MACDosc_1 is val([MACD osc],1). !Prior day’s MACD oscillator value
!RULES FOR GENERATING REPORTS:
PMACxup if price > PMACDsignal_1
and valrule(price <= PMACDsignal_1,1) and price > minPrice.
PMACxdn if price < PMACDsignal_1
and valrule(price >= PMACDsignal_1,1) and price > minPrice.
PMACDsigPct is (PMACDsignal / [close] – 1) * 100.
AvgRangePct is simpleavg(([high]/[low]-1)*100,200).
NearXO if price > minPrice and abs(PMACDsigPct) <= AvgRangePct*rangeFactor.
ShowValues if price > minPrice.
—Richard Denning
info@TradersEdgeSystems.com
for AIQ Systems
Nov 6, 2013 | Seasonality, sector funds, trading strategies
This post is more of an FYI than a specific call to action, still a reasonably good trend is a reasonably good trend.
As many investors know by now the November 1st into May time period has historically been very good for the stock market. One of the better performing sectors during this time period has tended to be the semiconductor/electronics sectors. Among tickers worthy of analysis are:
-FSELX (Fidelity Select Electronics mutual fund)
-SMH (HOLDRs Semiconductor ETF)
In a nutshell, the semiconductor/electronics sectors tend to perform well between October 31st and April 30th. The results for FSELX since October 1994 appear in Figure 1.

Figure 1 – FSELX Performance October 31 to April 30
A chart of the annual growth of $1,000 appears in Figure 2.

Figure 2 – $1,000 invested in FSELX 10/31 through 4.30 since 10/1994
In a nutshell:
-FSELX has been up 14 times (74%) and down 5 times (26%).
-The average gain was +18.7% and the median gain was +13.7%.
-The worst declines were -32.9% during 2000 to 2001 and -19.9% during 2007 to 2008, so remember that there is definitely risk involved
Figure 3 – Fidelity Select Electronics (Ticker FSELX) (Courtesy: AIQ TradingExpert)
Summary
Please do not read this post and think “Aha, semiconductor/electronic stocks are sure to rally.” That is not the implication I am trying to make. Simply remember that the “trend is your friend” and that this sector tends to perform well during this time period. As long as these stocks act well it may be wise to give the bullish case the benefit of the doubt.
ay Kaeppel
Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro (http://aiq.com) client
Jay has published four books on futures, option and stock trading. He was Head Trader for a CTA from 1995 through 2003. As a computer programmer, he co-developed trading software that was voted “Best Option Trading System” six consecutive years by readers of Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities magazine. A featured speaker and instructor at live and on-line trading seminars, he has authored over 30 articles in Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities magazine, Active Trader magazine, Futures & Options magazine and on-line at www.Investopedia.com.
Nov 1, 2013 | ETFs, trading strategies
A lot of U.S investors have come to realize in recent years that there are many trading opportunities outside the USA. This creates something of a bad news, good news, bad news, good news situation.
-The bad news is that picking individual stocks is never an easy thing even if you focus only on domestic U.S. companies. For the average investor to successfully pick and choose among individual stocks around the globe is simply too much to expect.
-The good news is that the proliferation of international ETFs – Single country funds, regional funds, global funds, etc. – has made it much easier for investors to diversify across the globe than it used to be.
-The bad news is that the proliferation of ETFs has also reached a point where choosing an international ETF is getting to be almost as confusing as choosing a phone plan.
-The good news is that there are ways to simplify and systematize things.
So let’s take a look at “one way” to play the international stocks game.
BRIC vs. SPX
BRIC refers to an index comprised of stocks from Brazil, Russia, India and China. For the purposes of this article I will demonstrate a simple method for switching between BRIC and the S&P 500 Index.
The Vehicles:
For calculating switches I will use:
1) An index I created using AIQ TradingExpert. I refer to it as BRICINDX and it is comprised of single-country ETF tickers EWZ (Brazil), RSX (Russia), INP (India) and FXI (China).

Figure 1 – Jay’s BRICINDEX
2) Ticker SPX (i.e., the S&P 50 Index)
For actual trading purposes there are a few choices that I will discuss a little later.
The Method:
I will use a method I learned a long time ago from David Vomund, President of Vomund Investment Management, LLC and the author of “ETF Strategies Revealed.” The measure calculates the relative strength between two assets on a weekly basis. When the trend of relative strength reverses in a particular direction for two consecutive weeks it signals a switch into the stronger index.
The Test:
We start our test on 10/26/01 simple because that is the first time we can get a good reading using back data. Each week we look at the relative strength of my BRICINDX versus the S&P 500 Index (ticker SPX). If the RSMD rises for two consecutive weeks we want to switch into the BRICINDX and if the RSMD declines for two consecutive weeks we want to switch into the S&P 500 Index.
Figure 2 displays the switches over the past several years.

Figure 2 – BRICINDEX (vs. SPX; lower clip)
When an “Up” arrow occurs in Figure 2, the system switches into BRICINDX, when a “Down” arrow occurs in Figure 2 the system switches into ticker SPY. The results of this “System” are displayed in Figure 3. Note the two columns at the far right:
Switch: The growth of $1,000 using the system
Split: The growth of $1,000 split evenly between BRICINDX and SPY.
|
|
|
BRIC |
SPY |
Switch |
Split |
Switch |
Split |
Date |
Date |
Index |
%+(-) |
%+(-) |
%+(-) |
%+(-) |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
10/26/01 |
2/8/02 |
BRIC |
20.9 |
3.7 |
20.9 |
12.3 |
1,209 |
1,123 |
2/8/02 |
2/22/02 |
SPY |
13.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
7.0 |
1,209 |
1,201 |
2/22/02 |
5/10/02 |
BRIC |
(12.6) |
(3.2) |
(12.6) |
(7.9) |
1,057 |
1,106 |
5/10/02 |
7/19/02 |
SPY |
(25.0) |
(23.8) |
(23.8) |
(24.4) |
806 |
837 |
7/19/02 |
8/2/02 |
BRIC |
(14.1) |
1.9 |
(14.1) |
(6.1) |
692 |
786 |
8/2/02 |
11/1/02 |
SPY |
(0.8) |
8.8 |
8.8 |
4.0 |
753 |
817 |
11/1/02 |
6/27/03 |
BRIC |
45.0 |
7.1 |
45.0 |
26.0 |
1,091 |
1,030 |
6/27/03 |
8/29/03 |
SPY |
18.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
11.8 |
1,000 |
1,000 |
8/29/03 |
11/14/03 |
BRIC |
10.9 |
2.1 |
10.9 |
6.5 |
1,109 |
1,065 |
11/14/03 |
12/12/03 |
SPY |
11.9 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
7.2 |
1,137 |
1,142 |
12/12/03 |
1/23/04 |
BRIC |
16.4 |
7.7 |
16.4 |
12.1 |
1,324 |
1,280 |
1/23/04 |
7/2/04 |
SPY |
(18.5) |
(3.4) |
(3.4) |
(10.9) |
1,279 |
1,140 |
7/2/04 |
11/5/04 |
BRIC |
29.0 |
4.7 |
29.0 |
16.8 |
1,650 |
1,331 |
11/5/04 |
12/3/04 |
SPY |
9.0 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
5.4 |
1,679 |
1,403 |
12/3/04 |
12/31/04 |
BRIC |
(0.2) |
0.9 |
(0.2) |
0.3 |
1,675 |
1,408 |
12/31/04 |
2/11/05 |
SPY |
5.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
2.9 |
1,681 |
1,449 |
2/11/05 |
3/25/05 |
BRIC |
(4.3) |
(2.8) |
(4.3) |
(3.5) |
1,609 |
1,398 |
3/25/05 |
7/1/05 |
SPY |
8.1 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
5.4 |
1,653 |
1,473 |
7/1/05 |
10/21/05 |
BRIC |
13.9 |
(0.4) |
13.9 |
6.7 |
1,882 |
1,572 |
10/21/05 |
1/13/06 |
SPY |
18.3 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
12.9 |
2,024 |
1,776 |
1/13/06 |
3/17/06 |
BRIC |
9.6 |
1.6 |
9.6 |
5.6 |
2,219 |
1,876 |
3/17/06 |
4/28/06 |
SPY |
9.0 |
(0.0) |
(0.0) |
4.5 |
2,219 |
1,961 |
4/28/06 |
5/26/06 |
BRIC |
(13.5) |
(3.3) |
(13.5) |
(8.4) |
1,920 |
1,796 |
5/26/06 |
8/4/06 |
SPY |
9.2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
5.4 |
1,948 |
1,892 |
8/4/06 |
9/1/06 |
BRIC |
2.1 |
2.9 |
2.1 |
2.5 |
1,988 |
1,939 |
9/1/06 |
10/20/06 |
SPY |
4.2 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
2,076 |
2,023 |
10/20/06 |
2/16/07 |
BRIC |
23.4 |
6.2 |
23.4 |
14.8 |
2,561 |
2,322 |
2/16/07 |
4/13/07 |
SPY |
5.2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
2.8 |
2,573 |
2,387 |
4/13/07 |
8/17/07 |
BRIC |
5.0 |
(1.4) |
5.0 |
1.8 |
2,700 |
2,430 |
8/17/07 |
9/7/07 |
SPY |
11.2 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
6.0 |
2,722 |
2,576 |
9/7/07 |
12/21/07 |
BRIC |
35.8 |
2.4 |
35.8 |
19.1 |
3,696 |
3,067 |
12/21/07 |
4/25/08 |
SPY |
(9.3) |
(6.4) |
(6.4) |
(7.9) |
3,458 |
2,826 |
4/25/08 |
6/13/08 |
BRIC |
(3.0) |
(2.4) |
(3.0) |
(2.7) |
3,353 |
2,749 |
6/13/08 |
12/5/08 |
SPY |
(57.0) |
(35.5) |
(35.5) |
(46.2) |
2,164 |
1,478 |
12/5/08 |
6/26/09 |
BRIC |
53.1 |
5.4 |
53.1 |
29.3 |
3,314 |
1,911 |
6/26/09 |
10/2/09 |
SPY |
20.4 |
12.2 |
12.2 |
16.3 |
3,719 |
2,223 |
10/2/09 |
11/6/09 |
BRIC |
9.6 |
5.3 |
9.6 |
7.5 |
4,076 |
2,388 |
11/6/09 |
4/9/10 |
SPY |
5.6 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
7.5 |
4,454 |
2,567 |
4/9/10 |
4/23/10 |
BRIC |
(2.0) |
1.3 |
(2.0) |
(0.3) |
4,365 |
2,558 |
4/23/10 |
6/18/10 |
SPY |
(6.2) |
(8.2) |
(8.2) |
(7.2) |
4,008 |
2,374 |
6/18/10 |
11/19/10 |
BRIC |
11.7 |
7.9 |
11.7 |
9.8 |
4,475 |
2,606 |
11/19/10 |
3/11/11 |
SPY |
(0.1) |
8.2 |
8.2 |
4.0 |
4,843 |
2,712 |
3/11/11 |
5/6/11 |
BRIC |
(0.4) |
3.6 |
(0.4) |
1.6 |
4,823 |
2,755 |
5/6/11 |
6/10/11 |
SPY |
(1.9) |
(5.2) |
(5.2) |
(3.6) |
4,571 |
2,656 |
6/10/11 |
7/15/11 |
BRIC |
(1.7) |
2.3 |
(1.7) |
0.3 |
4,494 |
2,664 |
7/15/11 |
11/4/11 |
SPY |
(11.7) |
(3.3) |
(3.3) |
(7.5) |
4,344 |
2,463 |
11/4/11 |
12/16/11 |
BRIC |
(15.3) |
(4.7) |
(15.3) |
(10.0) |
3,678 |
2,216 |
12/16/11 |
1/20/12 |
SPY |
16.0 |
9.4 |
9.4 |
12.7 |
4,024 |
2,497 |
1/20/12 |
3/23/12 |
BRIC |
2.4 |
7.6 |
2.4 |
5.0 |
4,121 |
2,623 |
3/23/12 |
7/6/12 |
SPY |
(15.3) |
(4.4) |
(4.4) |
(9.9) |
3,938 |
2,363 |
7/6/12 |
2/1/13 |
BRIC |
17.5 |
10.5 |
17.5 |
14.0 |
4,628 |
2,694 |
2/1/13 |
7/26/13 |
SPY |
(15.2) |
12.7 |
12.7 |
(1.3) |
5,216 |
2,660 |
7/26/13 |
|
BRIC |
13.1 |
4.4 |
13.1 |
8.8 |
5,900 |
2,893 |
Figure 3 – BRICINDX vs. SPY
Figure 4 displays the trade-by-trade result in graphical form.
Figure 4 – Jay’s BRIC/SPY System (blue line) versus Split/Buy-and-Hold
A Few Performance Notes
-An investor who had split $1,000 between BRICINDX and SPY in 2001 would now have $2,893, a gain of 189.3%
-An investor who had utilized this switching system starting with $1000 in 2001 would now have $5,900, a gain of 490%.
So you clearly see the potential long-term benefit.
-Long-term is the key phrase. While the system clearly outperformed over time, over any trade or series of trades there is no guarantee that that will be the case.
-One other thing to note is that this particular system is allows long the stock market, either foreign or domestic. This means that if there is a global bear market (such as 2008) this system will suffer. Therefore, aggressive investors might consider building in some sort of market timing in order to avoid some of the downside.
A Few Trading Notes
For actual trading purposes a trader can emulate my BRICINDEX by splitting money between the four ETFs that comprise the index. There are other, easier alternatives including:
-Ticker VWO: Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF does not track these four funds exactly but has a correlation of roughly 97% with the BRICINDX and enjoys active trading volume.
-Ticker BKF: iShares BRIC Index Fund is the fund most closely correlated to my BRICINDX, however, trading is very thin.
-Ticker DXELX: This is the Direxion 2x leveraged Emerging Markets open end mutual fund. The leverage creates more profit potential (with commensurate downside risk) and this is a good choice for someone who would rather trade a standard mutual fund than an ETF.
-Ticker EDC: I am leery of 3x leveraged ETFs, but someone looking to “go for the gusto”, -Direxion Emerging Markets 3x ETF offers a lot of upside potential (but also a great deal of downside risk)
Summary
The “system” I’ve detailed here isn’t necessarily something that you should rush out and start trading right this very minute. Still, it does illustrate a few things:
-It is possible to “beat the market” (in this case, the “market” is defined as a portfolio evenly split between foreign and domestic stock indexes) over time using a mechanical approach.
-It is possible to profit from global stock market trends without becoming an expert in Chinese stocks or Russian stocks (or whatever country’s stocks).
-Demonstrating the discipline to follow an objective approach to investing is one of the keys to long-term success.
All in all it’s just another, well, you can sing the rest of it yourself……
Jay Kaeppel
Chief Market Analyst at JayOnTheMarkets.com and AIQ TradingExpert Pro (http://aiq.com) client
Jay has published four books on futures, option and stock trading. He was Head Trader for a CTA from 1995 through 2003. As a computer programmer, he co-developed trading software that was voted “Best Option Trading System” six consecutive years by readers of Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities magazine. A featured speaker and instructor at live and on-line trading seminars, he has authored over 30 articles in Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities magazine, Active Trader magazine, Futures & Options magazine and on-line at www.Investopedia.com.